Sunday, November 20, 2022

Don't Lose Sight of Tovas Lev even in Traffic

 From an article printed in this week's issue of Yated Ne'eman. (Pg 24) by Rabbi Avrohom Birnbaum

Don’t Lose Sight of the Tovas Lev B⁰arometer…Even in Traffic  See full article HERE

Someone.. went to the Steipler Gaon and asked the Steipler, “What should I look for when it comes to shidduchim?” The Steipler replied by repeating the same two words over and over and over again. What were those two words? “Tovas lev, tovas lev, tovas lev.” She should have a good heart, a benevolent heart, a heart that wants to do tovos for others, a heart that not only wants to do tovos, but seeks to do tovos, a heart with a natural instinct to help, to empathize, to feel the plight of another...

.....You Won…For Now

That brings me to another painful but related topic. It is also an “ikkar and tafeil” issue. We all know what the ikkar is: Torah, mitzvos, middos tovos… You go to a levayah and hear stories about how much the niftar had been devoted to learning, how she supported his learning at all costs, how kind she was and how generous he was, how many poor people he or she helped, how many yeshivos he supported, and the list goes on.

I don’t recall anyone saying that he was so clever that when he designed the building/store/development, he was able to finagle the powers that be to allow him to provide patrons with fewer parking spaces, even though everyone knew that there was way below the appropriate number.

No one will say that he built a supermarket or even a shul or yeshiva and ruined the quality of life of all the neighbors because he somehow figured out how to get away without providing parking or with building a narrow street so that for the next four decades, his fellow Yidden were inconvenienced…

I sometimes drive through developments and experience frustration, and I see the frustration on the faces of the many others who are stuck and I wonder. Yes, the primary fault lies with the government officials who set policy at the top and those who serve at their pleasure, but what about the developer or the owner? Certainly, you can get away with it. Certainly, you can make more money and get a few more square feet in or another unit in, but think for a second: Is it worth it that for the next countless years, you might be damaging scores of fine people who just want to live their lives? Is it worth it that so many Yiddishe mammes and tattes should come to work, yeshiva, or wherever they are going stressed out and frustrated because you managed to figure out how to get the right lawyer and the right corrupt engineers and traffic study people to knowingly lie or at least fudge the truth? Yes, you won. You made a few dollars. But did you really win?

Is the suffering of all those Yidden because you were able to get away with it really worth it? After 120 years, do you really want to have some cheilek in that peckel? Really? Think about the long term just for a second.

There is another thing as well. What about the chillul Hashem? Does the fact that the town in which you reside, a town that symbolizes frum Jews, have a name for being corrupt, for being ugly and congested with not a whit of care for its long-suffering citizens, make the name of Hashem beloved to others? When political campaigns in neighboring towns say, “We don’t want to become the urban mess that is next door,” does that make Hashem’s Name beloved or desecrated?

And one more thing while we are at it. When a mosad of chinuch, a yeshiva or a Bais Yaakov, makes a simcha hall without providing adequate parking or tries to change the law to allow for inadequate parking even when they know that it will snarl traffic and cause sakanah, is that not a colossal chillul Hashem? Yes, we understand that our mosdos need to be solvent and the income from a simcha hall is helpful, but at what cost? Are you willing to sacrifice your primary mission of inculcating Torah and Torah values into your young charges by engaging in conduct that shows greed and hardball-playing that are the diametric opposite of Torah values? Do you not realize what hypocrisy that conveys?

What Do You Want Said in Shomayim?

Let us remember the Steipler’s lesson of tovas lev.

We sometimes get so caught up in winning the momentary battle that we don’t think about winning the war. After 120, no one is going to say at a person’s levayah that because of that person, neighborhoods were ruined, people suffered daily and nightly in traffic, and people were injured or killed r”l because of the intolerable traffic situation.

No one would be so insensitive to say something like that at a levayah, but what about up Above, in Shomayim?

Let’s take a lesson from Eliezer and Rivka about priorities, and instead of just preaching, let’s actually put our money where our mouths are or put our mouths where our money is…
!

19 comments:

  1. Uh oh someone’s going to be getting threatening phone calls that his kids will be thrown out of school and other threats.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Is the suffering of all those Yidden because you were able to get away with it really worth it?"

    I would posit that if the author really wants to change things, it's necessary to emphasize caring about all people's suffering and not just Yidden's - and not just in the shallow "it makes us look bad and causes a chillul hashem" way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If the author was publishing his article on Hefkervelt, he would’ve likely reworded it your way. But the article was printed in the Yated for a specifically targeted readership where he was able to bring out a different message.

      Delete
    2. I wish I can upvote this comment a million times. This attitude is the number one reason a friend of mine lost his emunah.

      Delete
  3. R' Meir Chodosh in his inimitable style wouldn't necessarily agree. He told a student who received reports and was concerned the girl had attitude and middos issues: the contrary, for you that's better

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I disagree with your understanding of that story. And please don’t make it sound like R’ Chodosh would be in any way okay with what’s going on.
      He would not!

      Delete
    2. For him that was less than surprising.
      If you have a more realistic interpretation, go ahead.

      Delete
  4. If we reduce the buildable areas prices will go up and then we complain about housing being too expensive. The only solution is a not for profit builder. That is what BMG should have done years ago. Too late now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your argument is ridiculous.

      Firstly, these so-called not-for-profitters are charging no less for their developments than the ๐’‡๐’๐’“- profiters. And just because they call themselves not-for-profit doesn’t mean they really are.

      Secondly, why on earth would you argue that we should shoot ourselves in the foot by not providing adequate parking for Simcha Halls so there can be a bigger housing supply - which you assume would in turn keep the housing cost down? Even if that really big stretch were true, it is no justification to ruin our infrastructure by stuffing an insane number of cars on the road and wasting hours upon hours of our lives being stuck in traffic - which could easily have been avoided if only the Committee would require adequately sized off-street parking lots!

      With regard to BMG, I don’t see them lowering their rental rates for their apartment buildings because of their NFP status. So your assertion is out the window. They run their affairs just like any other for-profit business. And they’d do the exact same if given the opportunity to build houses for purposes of sale.

      Delete
    2. AB -
      That is not how it works in this town. Prices go up according to what people are willing to pay and can afford.
      For example, 10 years ago when a duplex in Lakewood went for 450K while at the same time a house in BP was 1.2M. At that time no one in his right mind would have paid 1.2M for a duplex in Lakewood
      But over the time real estate agents were able to push prices upwards, for a few reasons but bringing in people from NYC who are ok with paying more for housing was a large factor. Yes, REAs were just doing their job, but we Lakewood natives had to suffer from that.
      Had the planning board been more interested in quality of life than others interests, it would have pushed more people into neighboring towns earlier. Prices would not have ballooned to what they are now

      Delete
    3. the argument of Brooklyners raised Lakewood prices has long ago been proven incorrect. It used to be that when someone left yeshiva he moved out of Lakewood. That is no longer the case, which created a whole new market for baal baatim. Nothing to do with Brooklyn movers.

      Delete
    4. Proven incorrect?
      LOL, I would like to see the study the the data and evidence proving this theory wrong.
      People stopped moving out to NY around 30 yrs ago, Chassidim started coming to Lakewood in a concerted organized way 10 years ago. Coincidentally that is when prices started shooting up.

      Delete
  5. This is a really good article. It drives it’s point very well. And it’s very timely too!

    ReplyDelete
  6. ONE OF THE BEST ARTICLES EVER.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why can’t we put term limits on local township committee members so one person isn’t their long enough to be “bought” to look the other way I’ve written this idea many times but no one pays attention to it this would minimize builders and developers cozying up to the powers that be in this town though at this point it’s already way too late just try driving from south to north on route 9
    a 6 minute drive takes you at least 15-20 minutes why you ask because all these over stuffed developments were okayed all along route 9 forget the added families living in the basements that’s another story…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a good one
      Push a referendum for this

      Delete
  8. Some very important points, but like so many writers the author seems to think that this is exclusively a Lakewood problem. Any area which has a thriving economy will have these issues. It is easy to blame corruption and greed but the problem is one of economics. Think about it; if people are willing to sit in 20 minutes of traffic in order to live in Lakewood, then widening roads will only lead to more people moving into town until the traffic gets to the point where it is 20 minutes.

    Plenty of other towns and cities have this problem. This is not a Jewish/chilul Hashem problem. Let’s stop this self hating and let’s stopping agreeing with anti semites who, let’s be honest, are largely motivated by xenophobia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Incorrect. It is absolutely a problem of government officials not keeping a reasonable ratio of housing and infrastructure. The people corrupting the officials are equally responsible.

      NYC and other liberal enclaves do have lots of traffic. But that's intentional.

      Delete
    2. When Township committees spend years going out of the way to avoid manageable realistic planning, they are guilty as charged

      Delete