Tuesday, March 23, 2021

APP: Fires reporter Explains how Offensive Caption Slipped Through

 From the editor: How an offensive caption ended up online and the new checks we put in place

Paul D'Ambrosio, Editor  Asbury Park Press, published at 9:03 am

APP- The call came shortly after 7:30 p.m. Sunday. A photo with an obscene and offensive caption had been published on APP.com, appearing in a photo gallery that accompanied a story about a Lakewood health center administering COVID-19 vaccines. I was shocked and disgusted when I learned it was true. We immediately issued an apology, but I also want to be transparent with you about what happened and what actions we’ve taken since to ensure it does not happen again. I won’t repeat the caption here, but the words were offensive to women, the Jewish community and Lakewood, and included a slang term that was simultaneously offensive to Jews and Asian Americans. I thought someone had hacked our content management system. In reality, it was a reporter who admitted that he did a “stupid, stupid thing.” This was an inexcusable act. The objectification of women and religious insults are intentional actions. 

The reporter in question is no longer with the company.

He wrote an apology that reads, in part: “I’ve prided myself as a man who has been an advocate and supporter of women’s rights and cultural sensitivity, but this caption shows that I have plenty of work to do to address my own issues to make sure that my words and actions always treat others with respect.”

Here is how that caption got past our safeguards:

A reporter had taken photos of vaccinations, including one event in Lakewood on Feb. 25. That image remained in his camera until he wrote a story on Saturday, March 20, and uploaded 22 images into our content management system. Our reporters and photographers can file their images directly into the system, ensuring that breaking news can get to readers as quickly as possible. The usual safeguards involve an editor or digital producer reading the story and captions before publication. 

But the system does allow staffers to publish directly to our website and mobile app. We trust the professionalism of our employees and know speed can be important when covering breaking news. This system has been in use for nearly a decade, and across our suite of 250-plus publications, we have not had a similar incident to this one.  

Unfortunately, the offensive caption was live from Saturday night until it was discovered later Sunday. It was on the last of 22 photos, and no second set of eyes had reviewed the images. The late hour and the self-publication led the story to blend in with the dozens of other stories on the site without the proper safety checks.

As the executive editor, I take full responsibility. It is my job to ensure that the Press serves the public every day and that our content is fair and accurate. Each staffer goes through mandatory diversity and sensitivity training. Last year, I established a diversity, equality and inclusiveness group to reinforce our commitment to all communities of color and gender at the Jersey Shore. 

The last five of our nine most recent hires have been diverse candidates. In a survey of all Gannett newsrooms, the Press had one of the most diverse news staffs in the company, reflecting the diverse nature of the Jersey Shore. 

The error of one staffer is not reflective of our newsroom. Our reporters, photographers, producers, editors and support staff are dedicated, hard-working professionals who take pride in serving you each day.

 On Monday, I instructed our staff to always put two sets of eyes on each piece of content, including stories and photos. No photo and caption will be published without another staffer looking it over, regardless of the time of day.

I know the Press failed you this weekend. But please understand how seriously we take our responsibility to this community, now and in the days and years to come. I’d like to reiterate my apology in closing: The Press and Gannett have a long history of fighting for inclusiveness, diversity and women’s rights. We took immediate and significant action once we became aware of the issue, and we changed our online procedures to ensure such an event never happens again.

Paul D’Ambrosio

Executive Editor

Asbury Park Press

14 comments:

  1. One lesson learned here is how some gentiles look at our nashim tznu'os.

    As Rabbi Daniel Mechanic quotes what a non-Jewish photographer told him: Rabbi, I just can't keep my eyes off the women at your weddings!

    I've seen non-Jewish men working at my development ogling the women, even making verbal comments about their looks.

    Which brings us to an unpleasant subject: Maybe our "tznu'os" are not truly dressing the way Hashem wants them to dress?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you blaming the victim?

      Delete
    2. Blame the victim. How nice!

      She was a regular lady, dressed regularly. If the photographer is such a sick character that his mind fell to the gutter, she is not to blame. And when women go to a chassuna, they are dressed well. As they should. בנות ישראל נאות הן, אלא שהעניות מנוולתן

      Delete
    3. I took the opposite lesson. Frum women have a sense of dignity which gives them special Chayn. Non Jews can sense that the frum women have tznius and refinement and this is very attractive to most men, as it is uncommon these days.

      Delete
    4. AnonymousMarch 23, 2021 8:07 AM,




      Well Put





      Delete
  2. They brag about their diversity, yet have no frum reporters on staff covering the frum community.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The frum media aint too better they are Propoganda machines and platforms used to deceive the public by powerful askanim and politicians.
      The frum online media is trash with clickbate headlines.

      Delete
  3. Yes we have a tznius problem men have a lot of nisyonos when shopping in the local stores the provocative and untznius dress is a michshol that keeps getting worse.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This whole story is ridiculous JAP is not a racist term when refferd to Jewish American princess. This is a bunch of noise like the blackface thing people like playing victim

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are missing the point.
      Imagine you were that lady in the picture. She showed up to do her job, as she does every day. She saw a journalist, but thought nothing of it. When her picture was taken, she was slightly uncomfortable, being an aidele Yiddishe lady. But she expected to be, at worst, just a part of a gallery of pictures, that nobody really noticed.
      But this pig of a reporter, with his uncouth attitude, drew attention to her in an unwelcome fashion, and made her feel cheapened and objectified.
      Imagine this happened to you, or your wife or daughter. Imagine she walked into a crowded store and someone yelled out a comment about her physical appearance. It would be painful and uncomfortable, and when the person does it to that Jewish woman, he is doing it to all of us.

      Delete
    2. missing the point
      AND even if
      So thin skinned & Woke are we??






      Maturity is the term even if difficult

      And we complain when Dr Suess gets removed

      Delete
  5. Funny how the self appointed spokespersons in lakewood are so outraged yet they accused the entire orthodox community as racists when 2 kids wore BLM gear and blackface. Some people love the spotlight and wont miss an opurtunity to use a microphone.

    ReplyDelete