Wednesday, October 30, 2024

Lakewood November Elections

Early voting is underway localy Lakewood has 2 seats up for election on the township committee and 3 seats on the BOE 
The good news is that Lakewood voters have choices at this year's ballot.
R' Moshe Raitzik is running as a republican for a seat on the Township Committee.
R' Moshe currently serves on the Board of Education, and he previously served on the Planning Board until this year when he was swapped by the Township Committee in favor of Yechiel Herzel.
Importantly, R' Moshe has a proven track record of fighting for "how can we do this even better."

A vote for Moshe Raitzik for Lakewood Township Committee is truly a vote for the taxpayer. Faanews.

The incumbents for township committee  didnt  have the decency to reach out to the Lakewood community pre election.

The needs of the kehilla and quality of life are continuously ignored to a point where people have given up and are told to just accept the reality or move away.  Yet they call themselves representatives of the entire town. Any opposition is quashed in the name of not keeping the "Achdus" .

Alot went on over the past few years and there's been not a peep out of anyone besides for some election time articles, puff pieces and PR through their controlled media outlets.

Are you happy the way the township committee is still in covid mode hiding from the public by meeting on zoom once a month for 10 minutes while the mayor speed reads a few emails of public commen denying any criticism or interactions from the public?

Are you ok that municipal taxes alone went up this year by 8 million after raising it by 4 million last year?

Are you OK with the committee  giving out over 7 million on tax breaks and abatements to corperations just this year while the taxpayers are left with the bill to pay the lost revenue 

Are you ok with a committee that voted themselves a huge salary increase of 20k while raising taxes on you to pay for it

Are you ok with having your bloc vote abused by the same few always getting the public funding allocated for Lakewood and not filtering the money down to the needs of the residents and infrastructure 

Are you ok with the attitude of always shifting blame on the county and state but taking no responsibility after being in office for over 20 years

Do you enjoy the traffic now  some predict it will soon become one big parking lot

There's an opportunity for change see below on candidate Moshe Raitzik

Lakewood BOE Member Moshe Raitzik Pursues Township Committee Seat with Focus on Transparent Growth and Public Safety

Moshe Raitzik, a Lakewood Board of Education member, is running as a Republican for a seat on the Township Committee, determined to bring a fresh perspective to the town’s leadership. Drawing from years of public service and community involvement, including a five-year tenure on the Planning Board and a long career as an educator, Raitzik is campaigning on a platform of transparent governance, responsible growth, and enhanced public services. His goal is to ensure Lakewood residents have more input in decision-making processes that impact their everyday lives.

In addition to his public roles, Raitzik balances a busy schedule with a deep sense of dedication to education and Torah learning. He spends his mornings studying at Beth Medrash Govoha (BMG) and works as a teacher in the afternoons. He believes that his dual role as an educator and student speaks to his strong ties to both the spiritual and practical aspects of the Lakewood community. His experience in education, on the Lakewood BOE and as a teacher, has further shaped his view on the needs of Lakewood's families, particularly in terms of education and safety for children.

One of the key issues Raitzik highlighted is the need to bring Township Committee meetings back to in-person formats. “Many people in Lakewood don’t have access to computers at home,” he said, explaining that the current reliance on Zoom meetings limits public participation. He aims to restore the openness of meetings, a move he believes would mirror the Board of Education’s return to in-person sessions and ensure better community involvement.

Drawing on his time on the Planning Board from 2019 to 2023, Raitzik is a strong proponent of ensuring that Lakewood’s growth is balanced with proper infrastructure. He pointed to several instances where the Planning Board’s decisions were overturned by courts due to the Township Committee’s lax regulations, leading to concerns about safety and sustainability. "Many residents attend planning board meetings to voice concerns about safety and privacy in their neighborhoods," Raitzik explained. "But the Planning Board’s hands are often tied because the construction is technically in compliance with the township’s master plan."

Raitzik therefore stressed the importance of updating the Township’s master plan to address these issues. He also emphasized that the master plan needs to be updated to make sure that the township's infrastructure can accommodate its growth. “We need infrastructure improvement now, and it’s really not happening at the pace that it should,” he said. He emphasized that new development should not proceed unless infrastructure like roads and utilities are in place to support it.

In addition to growth concerns, Raitzik highlighted the need for improved busing services, especially for children who attend schools on hazardous roads without sidewalks. He proposed that the Township take on greater responsibility for hazardous road busing, which is different from courtesy busing. “It’s not safe for pedestrians, especially children, to walk to school without sidewalks,” he said, urging the Township to cover the costs of busing on these unsafe roads.

Throughout the interview, Raitzik stressed the importance of voter engagement. “Too many people say, ‘Why should I vote? There’s no choice anyway.’ But every person’s vote matters,” he said. Raitzik hopes that his campaign will inspire more residents to participate in the voting process, especially with the upcoming presidential election.

The Township Committee race also includes Menashe Miller, a fellow Republican, and Democratic candidates Meir Lichtenstein and Salvatore Frascino. Raitzik believes that his fresh perspective and hands-on experience in public service make him uniquely qualified for the role. With a focus on practical solutions and an open-door approach to governance, he hopes to make Lakewood a safer and more efficient place for all its residents.

45 comments:

  1. For the BOE there are also choices who will represent the taxpayer. The 'fix the formula' candidates. Vote the incumbents out

    ReplyDelete
  2. I will support whoever Daas Torah supports, those of us on HUD like myself and dont need any gashmius want a shtot similar to the days of Reb Aron.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Define the eminently malleable DT
      or your family's present iteration of it

      Delete
    2. do you eat @ any restaurants?

      Delete
    3. Nowhere in the Torah does it say that you blindly follow daas Torah on a election of your municipality where you pay taxes.
      If anything the Torah and shulchan Aruch set clear guidelines how to establish a vaad haair or 7 tuvei haair there is supposed to be a system that elects and appoints the vaad giving everyone true representation not developers and newspaper and media editors
      Let's start with a true elected vaad first before you throw around the Daas Torah card using the Torah as a קרדום לחתור בו

      Delete
    4. Like many things, the Da'as Torah concept has undergone many metamorphises.
      It once meant the primacy of the superior Talmidei Chachamim of the generation in deciding Torah, as well as physical, matters. Nowadays, it means that we just listen to the most powerful people in the room. Some are bona-fide amei ha'aretz, others know slightly more than the amei ha'aretz, and others are so riddled with personal negi'us that would negate any Torah they have learned as irrelevant.

      Da'as Torah never meant that, that's not who Reb Elchanan was, and Rav Shach did not act like that.

      Delete
    5. Correct. The phrase appears exactly once in all of shas, where it actually means the exact opposite of the way it used today. Chulin 92, the phrase would appear to mean something explicitly written in torah as opposed "Daas Noiteh", meaning common sense or logic.
      מתניתין לא כרבי יהודה דתניא רבי יהודה אומר אינו נוהג אלא באחת והדעת מכרעת את של ימין איבעיא להו מיפשט פשיטא ליה לרבי יהודה ומאי דעת דעת תורה או דלמא ספוקי מספקא ליה ומאי דעת דעת נוטה ת"ש העצמות

      Delete
    6. This is exactly what Daas Torah means. The rabbanim in Lakewood are evidently happy with the way things are being run. Hefkervelt commenters constantly twist themselves into pretzels trying to square this with their supposed fealty to Daas Torah.

      Delete
    7. " Those of us on HUD..... " Which means we don't oppose anything free coming our way even if it's gashmius..... Well frankly some people are carrying the freight and actually paying and they don't like it. And the issue here is quality of life like people for some reason don't like sitting in traffic forever... Nothing to do with"shtot" nostalgia....

      Delete
    8. Find one Rav in Lakewood who allows and supports the constant גזילת ממון הרבים by powerful Asskanim who have been diverting money from the tzibbur to themselves and pet projects
      Should we start listing all the shtick

      Delete
    9. @anonymous 7:30pm, as a once loyal resident of Lakewood of nearly 50 years, I always obeyed Daas Torah and voted for whomever the Vaad recommended. But that train left the station many years ago. We see that over time, those serving in our local government stopped representing us and stopped acting in our best interest. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. At is point, when we see what happened to a once lovely town, I feel we have to vote out every person who is currently in power. We have to stop falling for the Daas Torah and Achdus cards. It's time for change, big time. Incidentally, neither the Vaad or the Roshei Yeshiva have come out for any of the candidates. So no worries about not listening to "Daas Torah."

      Delete
  3. Can someone please get this article printed and delivered to every home in Lakewood? We have no way to reach the masses due to the Voice and others being part of the many corporations in this town that dont pay property taxes! They wont publish anything against the current township who has bribed them with not having to pay taxes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The interview of Raitzik IS in the Yom Tov edition of the Voice, pages 198 and 200.

      Delete
    2. Good stuff on Raitzik in the Voice and Shopper this week! Vote him in!!

      Delete
  4. Chris Smith is running for reelection his money for Lakewood did not go to help any tax payers it was used to build new roads in Georgian Court the Lcsc also gets funding for programs but no ones taxes came down and quality of life keeps getting worse. With dangerous roadways no sidewalks and safety issues on the streets

    ReplyDelete
  5. Biggest proof that the township copmmittee has no regard for us, the taxpayer, that they threw Raitzik off and put Herzl back on the planning board so he can rubberstamp all the developers with high density and shtick. Raitzik wouild ask the obvious questions and just not allow it all to be approved.

    ReplyDelete
  6. While you're registering to vote, remember that the Gedolim (i.e., daas toireh) forbids women from voting.
    Agudah made up a heter -- phar gelt, memeg. Of course, the only people who get that gelt is . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm no big Daas Torah guy but claiming that Gedolim forbid women from voting in secular election sounds like baloney. It may be possible that in some places some Gedolim opposed women voting but Agudah does not need any heter to tell women to vote. The Agudah affiliated gedolim never held women should not vote in secular elections to begin with .

      Delete
    2. That's less than fully correct.Originally with the early debate on suffrage almost all authorities both within aguda & without held against women having the vote clout, although practically most tolerated it as lesser of evils ( liberal women voting the other way;our women bloc staying out)

      Delete
    3. Interestingly, Rav Miller traces the decline of American society to the decision giving women the right to vote. Politicians and judges then concerned themselves with appealing to the women vote to get elected, so they necessarily had to adopt softer policies and laws. That was the beginning of the end.

      Delete
    4. Sure. That's why we kicked the teeth out of the Hun and Jap, because we let women vote.

      Delete
    5. Oh my.Another case of your generation's having been born drowned in the Kool aid.Hard to even call it your fault.
      It was Women vote predominanted Isolationism which caused those aforementioned to have been in position to nearly conquer the world without anybody to stopping them !
      The pushback against women such as the building of an obviously male-only military society starting with male draft of 1940-1973 & the male-only R&D only then restored & repaired enough the havoc to "kick their teeth" eg NYT article: When we hated mom.

      Delete
    6. In Commonwealth countries it was women's vote which was predominant in their turning to socialism

      Delete
    7. In height, US women & men respectively were 3rd & 4th, just before women grabbed the vote.They are now both in the world around 40th.

      Delete
    8. I never heard that interpretation, that isolationism was because of girls. What do women have to do with Borah and Henry Cabot Lodge, and Wilson not taking a single Republican with him to Europe. Yes, they say Harding was elected because of his looks, but isolationism is Wilson's fault even before his wife took over. Wilson made it all or nothing and got nothing. Did his gaiva indirectly lead to the deaths of tens of millions?

      Delete
    9. That's what in your & my texts,but it was pc revisionism.
      60% of the public supported right from the get-go the League, in at least some form, before Women's attitude changes the national thrust.
      Lodge supported internationalism albeit with some justified caveats.
      Feminist Jeanette Rankin was the only member of Congress to vote against Pearl Harbor Declaration the very next day.
      Btw it was the same situation in Britain. The media in 1930s claimed the veteran public was worn out from the trenches.Even though ironically it was the Lady Astor crowd that were among the leading appraisers. All 30 male MPs who had been in the trenches were some of the biggest supporters of hardline stances vs Hitler
      opposing appeasement

      iircWomen as is their style would swing to the other extreme:In April 1923, an article appeared in the Münchener Post stating "women adore Hitler ";he was described as adapting his speeches to "the tastes of women who, since the beginning, count among his most fervent admirers". Women were also often instrumental in bringing their husbands & children into the Nazi political fold.

      Delete
    10. leading appeasers

      Delete
    11. A British paper around then noted wryly that a country as influential as the US ought to have a foreign policy.It had a foreign policy actually- supporting continued anarchic domestic frivolity

      Delete
    12. 2:57,
      While it couldn’t/ wouldn’t last forever there were still enough of the pre-suffrage prior ethic inside Combined with the can-do spirit to be drawn out in sudden existential circumstances.
      frankfurter, warren, burger, and CO.Would help usher out the rest. By the late 90s it would be just about done

      Delete
    13. I don't know what you mean. We kicked butt in the Persian Gulf War, totally routing the Camel Jockeys. The kids in Iran and Afghanistan were tough as nail. I mean, women's vote was inevitable and we not only survived, we became stronger as a nation. What country does not let women vote? Saudi Arabia. Real tough guys running around in their sheet dresses beggin America to defend them. Such nonsense. You cannot approach history with a thick paintbrush. How is the League matter PC revisionism? I was brought up Wilson was great and the Senate ruined everything. But I later came to understand that he could have had the league. The Lodge reservation about only Congress can authorize a war was a red herring. The league pact could not override the Constitution. It was all about stubbornness and principle, the scholar from Massachusetts against the scholar from NJ. Wilson could have had his league. As for Rankin, the only women in Congress, she had little influence. It was that Senator who filibustered the declaration of war that cause trouble, and led to the cloture rule. And yes, the nation, and Britain were worn out. But I don't see what that has to do with women. They are not doing the fighting and the boys don't listen to their mothers anyway when they join the army, especially when their fathers say it is ok. This is a silly conversation but it illustrates how we often jump with knee-jerk reactions without putting in analysis or depth of thought. I know y'all disagree, but America is now more powerful than it ever was. Used to be America versus Russia. Now, I doubt Russia could with even with China on its side. I remember reading how many tanks, ship, subs, every year in the Britannica yearbook and it was always close. Look at it now. And I don't want to hear about Chinese junk and knockoff products. China is in a lot of trouble, population declining, domestic market slumping, and worse of all, they have abandoned market principle in favor of a few basic industries in which they produce way more than they need and they want to dump upon the world. They won't catch up for 100 years, not 30 like Xi says. And Russia is even worse off. So maybe we are more powerful since women got the vote. I mean this whole war in the Ukraine is a breeding ground for American technology. AI, remote war, missile defense, everything is being tested out and guess whose companies are doing the business?

      Delete
    14. 4:49
      Just to grant a short response to a single thrust:The US managed to survive the "national malaise" by turning it's backs on progressive feminism & ERA -barely- through electing the unelectable Cowboy & conservative Senate in 1980. Deserved credit to those anti-feminist women activists led Phyllis Schlafly.It was never however going to last, once women suffrage & rights legislation received the control they got.

      Regurgitated Kool aid is still Kool aid.Whether long-winded or child babble

      Delete
  7. Vote the incumbents out! All of them. It is the only way

    ReplyDelete
  8. Against a mass idiot animal bloc.How?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Vote the first three on the Board of Education they will represent the taxpayers and students!

    ReplyDelete
  10. correct me if I am wrong but those on HUD like myself are NOT effected when taxes go up as my rent is 30% of income regardless.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's great until you need to find a new rental and there's nothing in your price range.

      Delete
    2. why would I need to move? I live in a bigger house than my neighbors who shlep into Brooklyn or the city everyday who are middle income? I am sameach bchelkoy

      Delete
  11. The committeemen voted raises for themselves over the past few years totalling way more than just 20K. It's actually closer to 70K!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Why is CBN pushing the vaad candidates

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and all avi schnall talking points too

      Delete
    2. What's nuts is that CBN says to give our current committeemen one more chance to prove themselves... That's ridiculous! They've been there for over 20 years!! If they haven't fixed it yet, why think they will do it now? It's the same as Kamala! If she was going to fix things, she should do it now! So should the Committee members... but they won't. They won't even speak up to defend themselves or promise anything. CBN is making things up completely!!

      Delete
    3. Who cares about CBN its one man's opinion who is ignorant on the issues. It's also a spokesmouth for Avi Shnall literally parroting his talking points.

      Delete
    4. Advertising dollars

      Delete