The fast Day of Erev Shabbos Parshas Chukas
By Rabbi Yehuda Spitz
‘Zos Chukas HaTorah’ There is no mention in the Gemara of the week of Parshas Chukas being one of tragedy, nor is it mentioned by the Rambam, nor Tur, nor Shulchan Aruch! Not even in the Siman where tragedies and proper days to fast are mentioned, Orach Chaim 580! In fact, most are wholly unfamiliar with anything specifically attributed to this week. Yet, the Magen Avraham, citing the Sefer HaTanya, tells of a terrible, albeit fascinating, historical tragedy. on Erev Shabbos Parshas Chukas. On that day, in the year 1242, 20 wagonloads (other versions state 24) filled with Gemaros and Talmudic literature, were burned in Paris.
The Magen Avraham prefaces his terrible tale by quoting certain writings[2]
explaining that it is “worthwhile for every Jew to cry for the burning of the Torah”. He then proceeds to tell of a customary annual fast specifically for this purpose, by agents of the Church and King Louis IX. The pretext was a public debate between an apostate monk and several of the most eminent rabbinical authorities in France; the official verdict against them a foregone conclusion[3]. The impact and importance of this loss was tremendous. Keep in mind that this occurred over 200 years before the printing press was invented, and each of these volumes was a priceless, handwritten manuscript. In fact, this was considered such an enormous loss for Klal Yisrael, that the famed Maharam M’Rottenburg[4], an eyewitness, composed an elegy for our loss, ‘Sha’ali Serufa Ba’Aish’, deemed so essential, that it is incorporated into the Kinos recited every Tisha B’Av (Kinah 41).
The great rabbis at the time, at a loss to understand the extent of the tragedy, inquired of Heaven by means of a dream (known as a she’elas chalom) to discover whether this terrible event had been so decreed by Hashem. The heavenly reply was a succinct three words ‘Da Gezeiras Oraysa’. This is the Aramaic translation (see Targum Onkelus) of the opening verses to Parshas Chukas, ‘Zos Chukas HaTorah’, ‘These are the decrees of the Torah’ (Bamidbar Ch. 19, verse 2). The Rabbanim understood from this cryptic reply that the burning of the Talmud was indeed Heavenly decreed. Moreover, they gleaned that it was due to the proximity of the Parsha that the tragedy transpired, and not the day of the month[5].
Therefore, and as opposed to every other fast on the Jewish calendar, instead of a specific day established as a fast day, this one, designated a Taanis for Yechidim (fast for individuals), was set annually on the Erev Shabbos preceding Parshas Chukas. For those fasting, Asarah B’Teves would not be the only Taanis that practically occurs on a Friday[6]!
Retribution for the Rambam?
Rav Hillel of Verona, a talmid of Rabbeinu Yonah, and another eyewitness to these events, wrote a famous letter[7] in which he considered the burning of the Talmud as a clear sign of Divine anger and retribution for the burning of the works of the Rambam, in the exact same place in Paris not even forty days prior!
After the Rambam’s passing (in 1204), many great scholars who did not agree with his philosophical observations in his ‘Moreh Nevuchim’ and ‘Sefer HaMada’ banned his sefarim, with a tremendous controversy erupting throughout the Torah world[8]. Eventually, a number of his detractors submitted copies of his work to the monks of the Dominican Order to determine whether the Rambam’s works contained heretical ideas. The Dominican Friars, naturally, summarily concluded that the Rambam’s writings were not only false, but blasphemous. In 1234, inMontpelier, France, they publicly collected and burned all copies they found of ‘Moreh Nevuchim’ and ‘Sefer HaMada’. Similarly, in 1242, afanatical mob burned many of the Rambam’s writings in Paris. Less than 40 days later, at the exact same site, the 24 wagonloads of the Talmud were burned, on Erev Shabbos Parshas Chukas[9].
According to Rav Hillel’s letter, the famed Rabbeinu Yonah, one of the Rambam’s primary opponents, took the Talmud burning as a Divine sign, and publicly and vociferously denounced his former position and opposition against the Rambam’s writings and instead emphatically concluded “Moshe Emes V’Toraso Emes, V’Kulanu Bada’in!” “Moshe and his Torah are true (here referring to the Rambam), while we all are liars”[10]. He planned on traveling to the Rambam’s grave (in Teverya) and begging forgiveness. Some say this tragic incident was the catalyst of Rabbeinu Yonah’s writing what came to be known as his Magnum Opus, ‘Shaarei Teshuva’.
Further Grounds for Fasting
After discussing the burning of the Talmud, the Magen Avraham offers another reason for fasting. On this very day, Erev Shabbos Chukas, two entire cities of Jews were brutally decimated, as part of the Gezeiras Ta”ch V’Ta”t, the Cossack massacres led by Bogdan Chmielnitsky ym”sh[11] in 1648 - 1649, as recorded by the Shach.
Although most know of the Shach as simply one of the preeminent halachic authorities, due to his extensive and authoritative commentary and rulings on the Shulchan Aruch, few know that he also wrote a sefer titled ‘Megillas Eifa’[12], detailing the horrific slaughter of tens of thousands (possibly hundreds of thousands!) of Jews (and hundreds of entire communities) during these terrifying years. Among his entries he mentions the two cities that were wiped out on this same day in the year 1648 (5408). Hence, the Magen Avraham avers, that it is proper to fast (Taanis Yachid) on Erev Shabbos Chukas, due to both of these tragedies happening on this same day in history.
Time for serious teshuva together as one loving nation.
ReplyDeleteNothing happens by coincidence. Everything Hashem does has a reason for it. We can still save ourselves from future horrific tragedies hitting klal Yisroel C"V. IF we all do teshuva together and beg Hashem forgiveness and beg for the coming of Mashiach.
You might want to rethink going to the country this week
ReplyDeletehttp://torasaba.blogspot.com/2018/06/going-to-country-this-week-you-might.html
Moshe Emes V’Toraso Emes, V’Kulanu Bada’in!”
ReplyDeleteFROM their later writings it is readily evident that they retained still a condescending attitude and believed that while his Compilations may be beneficial for some
for the most part they were not so healthy
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately this Supreme Court ruling was decided on ו׳ לפרשת חוקת as well
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obergefell_v._Hodges
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately this Supreme Court ruling was decided on ו׳ לפרשת חוקת as well
Apparently the Rishomim didn't accept the new approach of "how dare anyone try to give a reason for tragedies."
ReplyDeleteBecause they were rishonim. If we'd have rishonim in our times we'd still be able too.
DeleteThey did not view themselves that way — they viewed themselves like we ourselves today
DeleteIn any event some inquired of heaven with the response basically being we don’t give reasons, while others, due to the glaring similarity to very recent events, put forward a middah kneged middah retributory type of reasoning
Either way it’s a far cry from trotting out gneneric tznius, smartphones, chizuk in limud hatorah concerns which is basically that given rabbis pet peeve which is conveniently used as a hook to hang virtually any tragedy on
One major difference. The Rishonim didn't blame 'yennem'. They didn't blame the women, the other side of the fight, the chilonim, or the goyim. They looked inwards and blamed themselves.
DeleteProbability is although one can never declare for sure when a new sort of affliction hits that never existed prior it is because of a new sort of problem that never existed prior EG shul closing because of the virus connected to new sorts of technology being used there as never before
DeleteIt's hard to be sure regarding these sort of situations how they viewed themselves. But we can be sure of how they would have viewed us - much less qualified
ReplyDeleteNot sure what you mean by that. They viewed themselves as acharonei acharonim - as they were
DeleteI'm pretty sure that the Rambam considers it absolute cruelty to not look inwards, when ח"ו a tragedy befalls an individual or community. Looking inwards and recognizing that the tragedy is an unfortunate wake-up call. The job is to look inwards - but certainly to look and search.
DeleteA great Adam Chashuv told his son: the Moreh is for those who unfortunately are Nevuchim. We aren't.
DeleteThe Rambam is in the third perek of hilchos taanis. Pretty sure no Adam Chashuv disputes the Rambam.
DeleteYes. That is beyond dispute
DeleteRSZA isn't enough for you?
DeleteIn EY parshas Chukas was last week. Interesting that in different parts of the world this event is commemorated a week apart
ReplyDelete