And together with the kriyas haTorah come the piyutim.
Those piyutim.
They are printed in the back of the siddur, and somehow they end up in the back of our minds as well. Said by rote because at some point, somewhere, someone decided “this is the minhag,” without much awareness of what is actually being said. Or skipped entirely, as if they are an optional appendix to the real davening.
And that is the quiet tragedy.
Because these piyutim were not written as decorative poetry. They are densely woven from pesukim, from midrashim, from sugyos in Chazal. Every stanza is layered. Every phrase is deliberate. The paytanim who authored them lived in generations of upheaval and longing. They did not write filler; they wrote from a place of burning awareness of galus and yearning for geulah.
Take Parshas Zachor.
Zachor is not simply about recalling an ancient enemy. It is a mitzvas aseh d’Oraisa to remember Amalek to remember what it means when the world tries to cool off emunah, when mikreh replaces hashgachah, when kedushah is treated as coincidence. The piyutim surrounding Zachor expand that mitzvah into an avodah of consciousness. They speak of the incompleteness of the Kis’ei Hashem so long as Amalek’s presence lingers. They contrast erasure with eternal remembrance. They frame zechirah not as nostalgia, but as loyalty as resistance to spiritual indifference.
Shekalim calls us to achrayus every Jew
counted, every half-shekel equal, a reminder that communal kaparah requires collective participation. Parah moves us into the realm of taharah preparing ourselves, spiritually and nationally, to approach redemption in a state of readiness. HaChodesh lifts us into renewal the gift of sanctifying time, of beginning again, of reclaiming destiny.There is an exact progression:
The piyutim are the emotional and theological bridge between these stages. They slow us down enough to feel what the Torah is building.
Perhaps part of the difficulty is that they demand something from us. They assume familiarity with Tanach. They assume sensitivity to the language of Chazal. They are compressed and allusive. Without guidance, they can feel opaque.
And so they get reduced to sound.
But something encouraging has begun to happen. There is a growing hisorerus around these piyutim. New seforim with peirushim are appearing. Thoughtful explanations are being offered. Some machzorim now include brief, accessible introductions before each piyut not lengthy dissertations that derail the pace of tefillah, but just enough orientation to understand the central theme, the key imagery, the emotional core.
Just enough so that a person can keep pace with the tzibbur and still know what he is saying.
And that small shift changes everything.
When you understand that a stanza about a “diminished throne” is echoing Chazal’s teaching about the incomplete Kis’ei Hashem, it lands differently. When references to “coldness” and “erasure” are understood as descriptions of Amalek’s spiritual ideology, the words stop being abstract. When HaChodesh speaks of renewal in cosmic language, it feels less like poetry and more like promise.
No one is suggesting that Shabbos morning become a full iyun in piyut literature. But perhaps these weeks charged as they are with preparation for Purim and Pesach deserve more than mechanical recitation.
The Arba Parshiyos are not technical preliminaries. They are a structured ascent. The piyutim were composed to help us climb.
Maybe the avodah is simple: to move them from the back of the siddur to the front of our awareness. To give them a few moments of attention. To allow their language of memory, taharah, and renewal to resonate.
Because hidden in those back pages are words that tremble with emunah, with responsibility, and with longing for the shleimus of the Shechinah.
And they were meant to be felt.
A friend once commented to me how dorm
ReplyDeleteThis piece is 100% spot on. Go to a seforim store before Pesach and you’ll see dozens if not hundreds of different haggados on the tables but nary a Machzor. What happened to tapping into each Yom Tov’s unique themes with the special piyutim? Rav Shmuel Wosner used to say that Yom Tov without Maarovis simply isn’t Yom Tov.
ReplyDeletePeople like to say that piyutim are too difficult to understand so better to skip them. We invest millions of dollars into making Gemara and all other aspects of Judaism accessible. Why should this fall by the wayside?
PS: the first thing the Reform movement did was eliminate piyutim
It was plainly too difficult for this author to put the effort into writing an actual piece instead of using AI, so why does he expect the rest of us to put the effort in for piyutim?
DeleteOn a more serious note, most of the Jewish community stopped being metargem the Torah (something which according to some is from Har Sinai) because, as the Shulchan Aruch writes, there's no point if you don't understand it. At the end of the day piyutim are a minhag just like the targum, and minhagim change.
You lost credibility with your final sentence.
DeleteStopping saying piyutim has nothing to do with reform, whatever Reb Shmuel Wosner said about his personal experience.
The true reason many can't stand piyutim is because their Hebrew skills are quite limited. As more and more English options become available, people leave Hebrew/Aramaic for bochurim and Rabbanim and the rest find these texts cumbersome and strange. One would think that Bnei Torah who learn Hebrew/Aramaic all day would be more comfortable in those languages, but sadly the wisdom does not permeat.
For some reason, the old balebatish Shuls all said them but the new minyanim stopped for the most part. But if the hamon am isn't holding by it, whatever, we can look the other way like we do with lots of other things that they aren't holding by.
DeleteSo I agree with you that the bnei torah/baalei nefesh should be the ones who have the easiest time with it. Rav Shmuel Kamenetzky actually goes on the record in his haskama of one of the seforim that people should say them again now that we have peirushim (see https://moreshesashkenaz.org/en/other-publications/75-hashir-vhashevach and open the sample pages). But the peirushim are for the most part very lengthy and getting people to properly prepare them when so many struggle with just getting shnayim mikra done is a losing proposition.
What's really needed is something that people can pull off the shelf and get somewhat an idea of what they're saying without getting lost in a long translation or commentary.
How does he lose credibility with a 100% true statement?
DeleteIn any case, saying Piyutim is not just a "minhug", it is a חיוב learnt from an אסמכתא from a מפורש פסוק brought by the ראשונים and even mentioned in the גאונים
As for the balderdash of "they can't understand it" - if only you would say them, you would see how foolish the lie in that excuse really is.
Maybe next you'll stop saying many parts of Davining which are too hard for you to understand and are also far less of a 'Minhug' than piyutim?
I heard from Rav Dovid Moore בשם ,שליט"א Rav Chazkel Abramsky and להבח"ל from Rav Refoel Green בשם Rav Moshe זצ"ל the true reasons why they are not said in our circle, but מפני הכבוד I'll not be the one to publish them here
On the topic of seforim that works off the shelf and don't require advance study, there's Peirush Noach which translates the hard words into an easier Hebrew, but it's not yet in print - sample https://limewire.com/d/CCuty#xXFhQrWuEq.
DeleteAlso Machzor Shivchei Yeshurun which focuses more on the moods and themes etc. and is specifically designed to be extremely user friendly. Thought it was out of print but is back now. Saw a few copies at Torah Treasures and they also have a website where you can see sample pages and order - shivcheiyeshurun.com
Anon 9:02 - I am Anon 4:11, who said that people don't understand them. And I, personally, do say them. If the Shul I daven is skips them, I try and say them at home. Because I do understand them. But the lack of לשוה"ק knowledge is terrifying. Why? Why are people not comfortable reading books and seforim in לשוה"ק? If its not lomdish or mussar, the brain stops engaging. Why?
DeleteReb Shmuel Kamenetzky never said that they 'should' say them. He said that they 'will' say them.
DeleteThis movement is based on lies.
Piyutim are fine and great. But the fanatics need serious help.
AI article.
ReplyDeleteYup too much AI style but the point is brought out
DeleteYup too much AI style but the point is brought out
DeletePlease hefkervelt do not publish AI drivel. Matzav has become ekeldik from the obvious AI written articles and letters. It is extremely obvious that this was written by AI and it's גועל נפש
ReplyDeleteA Murderer or Amaleki? Parshas Zachor Special Feature Shiur said last night by Horav Michoel Sorotzkin in Yerushalayim
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/c_xMIBnsrFw
אמת יהגה חיכו של הכותב למעלה שהמסכילים היו הראשונים שביטלום בזמנינו לפני מאתיים שנה
ReplyDeleteובפרט יש לכל אדם מישראל לתמוה הפלא ופלא איך נפלת מכותינו, שכל אלו הפיוטים לדעת כל הראשונים כולם הם מיסוד *התנאים* עי' תוס' חגיגה די"ג: ד"ה ורגלי ותוס' רבינו יהודה ברכות ל"א. והאור זרוע הל' ק"ש שער י"ט ורבינו אליהו מנחם מלונדריש פ"ק דברכות מ"ו והרא"ש פרק אין עומדין סי' כ"א ושו"ת הרשב"א ח"א סי' תס"ט ודרשות אבן שועיב פ' שמיני עמ' רמ"ב והרשב"ץ ח"א סי' ל"ג ובמגן אבות ח"ג פ"ד ד"ה ואחר שדברנו ומאה שערים שער החמישי ועוד רבים מרבותינו וכמדומה שאין אחד מהראשונים שיחלוק ע"ז
והוא מילתא דתמיהא דלית ליה פשר ולא שחר היאך נהיה הדבר הרעה הזה לבטל מנהג כל ישראל מימות התנאים עד היום, ואפשר שהוא חיוב גמור ע"פ דין כמ"ש רבינו תם הו"ד בהגהות מיי' פ"ו מהל' תפלה ס"ג ובשבלי הלקט סי' כ"ח ומחזור ויטרי הל' ר"ה ועשי"ת סי' נ"ד ועוד
ואף אם הימצא תימצא איזה יחיד שסבר שלא לאמרם באמצע ברכת ק"ש וכדו' בלי ספק לכל ישר הולך בטל הוא באלף וברבבה.
ולא עוד אלא שאנשי דורינו שאינם אומרים היום מקצת הפיוטים כל מעשים בחושך ילכו ואינו אלא חוכה ואטלולי שהרי עיקר טענת היחידים החולקים על אמירתם הוא נגד שינוי נוסח ברכת ק"ש בשבת ואנן קיי"ל כתוס' והאו"ז דאם לא שינה ולא אמר הפיוטים של שבת לא יצא וצריך לחזור ולברך ברכת ק"ש [והמשנ"ב נדחק בזה מאוד ולהמעיין בפנים בראשונים יראה שאין דברי רבינו הח"ח מחוורים בזה ואולי לא ראה רבינו דברי האו"ז בפנים] וכן פיוט ממקומך שאומרים בכל שבת ויו"ט ושאר פיוטים שאומרים אפילו האידנא ות"ל לא עלה על דעת אדם לבטלם ובזה הם סותרים את עצמם לגמרי שהרי כל עיקר דברי החולקים לא נאמרו אלא עליהם
אלא שכל המשנה ממנהג חכמים ידיו על התחתונה ולא עלתה לו אלא טעותו וכן בכל שינוי המנהגים דהיום הזה ה' יצילנו מהם ומהמונם
It's not a new thing that piyutim are not said, and it's not due to the maskilim. There were always a variety of minhagim of which piyutim to say or not and when to say them in davening or afterwards. When kehilos got mixed, and most recently during WWI and WWII, the minhagim got lost. They are gone there's no longer a minhag, same as nobody (besides belz) fasting on 20 sivan. Once it's not someone's or their kehilas minhag,now to go ahead and start saying piyutim becomes problematic lihalchah. These days the meshaneh is the one who restarts saying piyutim.
DeleteI'm sorry to have to comment on your post in the following fashion so please accept this apology even before I start to write
Deletewhat you wrote is not true but rather a discombobulation stemming from a lack a real knowledge in the סוגיא
at least from the time of the אנשי כנסת הגדולה were said פיוטים down till a short time ago.
to even compare it to fasting on 20 sivan just goes to show how the lost we have become
הנצי"ב בשו"ת משיב דבר ביאר את המנהגים בטוב טעם.
Deleteובכל הדורות היו מאלה שמיאנו בפיוטים, כמו אחינו בני ספרד, הרב נתן אדלר שאמר הכל אחרי התפלה, ועוד ועוד גדולי ישראל.
יש יתומים שאימצו 'מסורה' ומנסים לכפות את כולנו אל תוך שיטתם. רוב הצועקים בעד הפיוטים לא גדלו בבתי מדרשים שאמרוהו, פוק חזי.
עיינתי במקורות שהביא הרב אנון - 7:15 לראות האם יש דברים בגיו.
Deleteהגהות מיימוניות פ"ו מהל' תפלה:
שם דחה את האוסרים, והביא המנהג שאומרים אותם. והוסיף שהוא 'מצוה מן המובחר'.
לא חיוב גמור.
ואין זה בשם ר"ת כלל אלא שר"ת התיר. הכותבים 'מצוה' הם ר"י ט"ע ורבינו אליהו הזקן.
שבלי הלקט סי' כח:
האריך בהיתר אמירת הפיוטים ודחיית דעת האוסרים. ולא הביא כלל שמחוייבים לאומרם, אלא כנ"ל מההגה"מ.
מחזור ויטרי:
כותב 'מצוה ומותר'. ואין נראה שכיוון לחדש יותר משאר הראשונים, אלא שיש בזה מצוה, ולא שמחוייבים לעשות כן.
והראיה מהמ"ב בענין ההוספות שמוסיפים בשבת ויו"ט אין לו שום ביאור, שאף החולקים על אמירת הפיוטים בכללותם אומרים ההוספות ההם.
וההאשמת חלק גדול מכלל ישראל בעבירות באשמת המסכילים היא דבר הרבה יותר חמור מאי אמירת הפיוטים.
ai garbage drivel entire post barely makes any sense
ReplyDeleteEvery cause has its fanatics. Piyutim is no exception. There is no point discussing תכלת with a תכלת fanatic, and same goes for piyutim.
ReplyDelete