Lakewood will end municipal garbage collection for private schools and houses of worship effective January 1, 2027, forcing yeshivos, Bais Yaakov schools, shuls and other institutions to arrange and pay for private trash removal. The move is expected to save the township approximately $2 million annually and is reportedly required by the state as a condition for financial assistance amid Lakewood’s budget crisis. The added expense will fall on institutions already facing tight budgets, potentially leading to higher costs for parents and donors. Matzav reports according to information obtained from the township, the elimination of garbage collection for private educational and religious institutions is not a voluntary policy change, but rather a condition imposed by state officials in connection with financial assistance intended to stabilize Lakewood’s finances.
The Lakewood Township Committee stated that “the change is being required by the state as a condition for the Township to receive financial assistance to help stabilize its budget. As a result, Township officials have little choice but to implement the policy.”
Lakewood residents have already been hit with property tax increases of as much as $2,000 for homeowners, while courtesy busing has been eliminated. Now, yeshivos and shuls are losing municipal garbage collection, shifting yet another expense onto already strained institutions and families.
This raises serious questions: Where is all the money going? With so many new homes added to the tax rolls, why hasn't the township done more to control spending and prepare for rising costs?
Officials have pointed to an expensive winter, including millions in snow removal costs. But residents can reasonably ask whether one costly winter in more than a decade should be enough to explain the township's broader budget problems.
Tax abatements are another concern, potentially keeping properties from contributing their full share to the tax base. Residents deserve a transparent accounting of municipal spending, the impact of tax abatements, and what steps have been taken to reduce costs before shifting more of the burden onto homeowners, parents, schools and shuls. With the Township Committee election underway, the incumbents seeking reelection have yet to provide clear answers, instead pointing fingers at everyone else.
With the Township Committee election underway, the incumbents seeking reelection have yet to provide clear answers, instead pointing fingers at everyone else.
This will fill the streets with garabge trucks, collectively cost much more than $2 million, and the township will have garbage infrastructure sitting idly. Township needs to figure out a way to legally offer cost price pickup to non profits. (Of course the useless committee will claim the state is blocking them)
ReplyDeleteThere's no such as cost plus.
DeleteIn a year or two, there will be posts and comments here to start charging.
This raises serious questions: Where is all the money going? With so many new homes added to the tax rolls, why hasn't the township done more to control spending and prepare for rising costs? This just assumes that with so many new homes added to the tax rolls, the township also gains the ability to control spending and prepare for rising costs without raising taxes. But new homes also creates additional municipal costs, including garbage collection, police protection, road maintenance, and infrastructure and yes busing for mandated children. And what if some of the children in this new home need special ed? The township spent almost 80 million on that in 2025. It's possible that Lakewood could be managed with more fiscal prudence. But it is also possible that it can't.
ReplyDeleteHomes on the tax rolls? Obviously you haven't heard of Harold Hershkowitz who explained for many years that homes are an overall negative to the tax rolls
DeleteAnd we keep on voting in the same clowns
ReplyDelete馃憤
DeleteIt is about time. Stop giving things out for free! Stop with the abatements. Stop giving away land for free. Enough! We can't fix what was already done but no reason to continue with this.
ReplyDeleteabout time
ReplyDeleteIt is about time we stopped picking up tax free institutions. Why should taxpayers pay $2,000,000?? When Lakewood has two schools then no bug deal but bh schools have grown and this is just not sustainable...
ReplyDeleteEither way vote only Raitzik.
We keep voting them in and they keep raising their salaries and hiring their relatives who I'm x sure what their jobs are!!!! Giving tax abatements is not acceptable!! How can they say it's fine to do that when they're cutting from everyone else's funding and raising everyone else's taxes??? If they built houses on Ave of the America's/States they'd be collecting taxes and alot of it so how is it legitimate to give a tax abatement??? And for 20-30 yrs!! Books need to be opened and heads need to roll and people that know real facts have to have meeting with the rabbanim and explain this isn't OK and we can't keep voting these people in. We're gonna have people in the streets soon it's not affordable to live in this town. It's cheaper to buy a house in Monsey and the taxes are cheaper today.
ReplyDeleteVote Raitzik
ReplyDeleteCurious who else you will vote besides raitzik? an empty ballot is essentially a vote for the other side
ReplyDeleteNo it's not.
DeleteTOTALLY NEED A FORMULA FIX HERE AS WELL> CANT WAIT FOR AN AUDIT @MOSHERAITZIK
ReplyDeleteTotally!!!
ReplyDeleteEveryone should chill. No other township does free garbage pickup for schools and shuls......Surrounding places don't even pick up your garbage from home, you pay for that yourself!
ReplyDeleteMayashpos Yarim Evyon, Please take home your garbage from Shul to save the Shul millions in waste!
ReplyDeleteobviously garbage pickup will be a large cost for teh schools and shuls however when you remember that most of the simcha halls in this towns are in schools or shuls, that means that teh taxpayers were subsidizing almost every wedding in town; including the ones where people come from of of town to make chasunos here because the cost is lower. i realize this will be a big problem for the shuls and schools that dont have simcha halls but you cant blame somene from looking at that cost and saying it has to stop.
ReplyDeletemore like taxpayers subsidizing the school - The schools make money off their events.. How about the schools and shuls also not paying property taxes and being used by the neighboring towns / children why are we subsidizing the neighboring residents? maybe Lakewood should has some use tax for the neighboring towns...
DeleteIts ok to stop garbage pick up from shula and schools if you don't give 20 yr tax abatements. Don't give some guys a free ride and others have to pick up the tab!!!
ReplyDeleteAnd the complacent media who got tax abatements and contracts who protect the politicians instead of doing their job
ReplyDeleteNothing will ever change until all the mosdos team up together with one plan, we're closing our schools- telling all from residents to enroll in the public school system- till than our local township will be taking all our money & laughing at us.
ReplyDeleteim voting straight vaad as we saw in Israel daas Torah said to ignore grievances and follow daas Torah
ReplyDeleteThe Vaad is the enemy.
DeleteIs it legal to reverse tax abatements?
ReplyDeleteIf things were honest and straight nobody should be paying for any institutions garbage pickup I pay dues and buy seats in my shul I don't pay for yours you don't pay for mine, if you don't like the amount of trucks on the street and having the township pickup will reduce the trucks which is not necessarily true then each shul should have a pick up for a fee. There is a mentality in this town that if I'm doing something right or for Torah everybody is on the hook. By the way that is not the way of the Torah
ReplyDeleteActually it is.
DeleteSheli sheli v'shelach shelach - Midas sodom
A Assemblyman in Trenton and nothing to show for it. No money from Trenton no courtesy busing we are a laughing stock.
ReplyDeleteSo much good it did us and the same guys pushed Gottheimer on the olam a dumb political move that cost us money and hate from Trenton. We are in golus fun unzere too.